Jason Kirsch, Contributor
Aug. 28, 2026
Every year around Labor Day, the same headline resurfaces: September is the worst month for stocks. It’s repeated so often it’s tempting to dismiss — the market’s version of a black cat crossing your path. Is the September Effect real? Unlike most trading superstitions, this one holds up under scrutiny. Decades of data show September genuinely underperforming every other month, on average.
Investor analyzes trading stock market trading fall down. The September Effect is a seasonal pattern that occurs where the stock market has a tendency to post weaker returns, on average, during September.
Getty
Whether that seasonal pattern ultimately matters depends on whether it influences investment decisions. Understanding the September Effect can help investors separate a statistically observable tendency from a reliable forecasting tool — and avoid making costly portfolio changes based on seasonality alone.
What Is the September Effect?
The September Effect describes the stock market’s tendency to post weaker returns, on average, during September than any other calendar month. It isn’t a prediction that stocks will crash on a specific date, and it isn’t tied to a single crisis.
For investors, the more relevant question is whether the current environment creates conditions that could reinforce—or overwhelm—that seasonal tendency. Factors such as valuations, interest rates, inflation, corporate earnings, Federal Reserve policy and overall investor sentiment have historically had a much greater influence on market performance than the calendar alone. This year, investors should view the September Effect as one piece of context rather than a prediction, evaluating it alongside the broader economic and market backdrop before making portfolio decisions.
S&P 500 Historical Monthly Performance Comparison
Numbers make the pattern easier to see. The table below compares September’s historical performance to October, the traditionally strong November to December stretch, and the quieter summer months of May through August, using long-run S&P 500 data from Yardeni Research and fool.com's research desk.
What the Historical Data Shows
September is the only month since 1928 with a negative average, landing in negative territory in a clear majority of individual years rather than being dragged down by one or two outliers—why researchers treat it as a genuine calendar anomaly rather than a coincidence built on cherry-picked years.
Still, averages can mislead if a few dramatic years do most of the work. Two questions help: how much of September's poor average comes from historical extremes, and whether the tilt is unique to the U.S. or shows up abroad too.
The Skew of Historical Outliers
Some of September’s worst moments were genuinely historic. In September 1931, the market fell roughly 30% in five weeks after Britain abandoned the gold standard, part of a stretch that left the Dow down 54% for the year. Seventy-seven years later, Lehman Brothers' September 2008 bankruptcy triggered a global liquidity crisis. And when markets reopened after the September 11 attacks, the Dow fell 7.1% in a single session.
These years pull the long-run average down meaningfully. But strip them out and September’s average is still slightly negative and still the weakest month.
Global Market Phenomenon or U.S. Anomaly?
The pattern isn't confined to Wall Street. September weakness has also shown up historically in the U.K.'s FTSE 100, Germany's DAX, Japan's Nikkei 225 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng, suggesting the effect is broader than any one country's tax code or fiscal calendar. If it were purely a quirk of U.S. mutual fund rules, a similar dip would be less likely to appear across markets with different regulations and calendars—though the strength of the pattern does vary by market and is most consistently documented in U.S. large-cap data.
Potential Drivers Behind Autumn Market Volatility
No single explanation fully accounts for September’s behavior. Most credible theories fall into three buckets: structural shifts in institutional money management, tax-related selling tied to fund accounting deadlines and investor psychology that reinforces the pattern once it's well known.
Post-Summer Institutional Rebalancing
CFRA’s chief investment strategist, Sam Stovall, has pointed to a simple behavioral shift: trading thins out over summer, and when institutions return in September, fresh scrutiny often means trimming underperformers ahead of the fourth quarter. September also closes the third quarter, prompting funds to rebalance and lock in performance before quarterly reporting.
Mutual Fund Fiscal Year-End Tax-Loss Harvesting
Most U.S. mutual funds run an Oct. 31 fiscal year-end. Managers often sell losing positions before that deadline to offset gains elsewhere, a practice known as tax-loss harvesting. With the deadline weeks away, September becomes a natural window for this selling, especially when many stocks are already sitting on losses heading into fall.
Behavioral Psychology and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
If enough investors expect September to be weak, some sell early to avoid the decline. That wave of selling can itself push prices lower, reinforcing the pattern. As financial media highlights the September Effect year after year, more investors become aware of it, potentially encouraging even more preemptive selling. Behavioral finance suggests that investor expectations alone can influence market outcomes, especially when enough participants act on the same belief. In this way, the September Effect may persist because market participants continue to anticipate it. While no single behavioral explanation fully accounts for the anomaly, research on investor attention and market behavior suggests that widely recognized calendar effects can become self-reinforcing as expectations shape trading decisions.
September Effect Vs October Effect
September has the lowest average return and highest share of negative years of any month, based on decades of data. The October Effect is largely a perception problem, stemming from famous crashes like 1929 and Black Monday in 1987, even though October’s average return has historically been positive and notably better than September's.
October's reputation rests on a handful of dramatic days rather than a broad pattern—confusing the two can lead investors to fear the wrong month.
How Investors Should Respond to the September Effect
Knowing about the September Effect and acting on it are two different things. Selling in late August and buying back in October sounds appealing, but it requires correctly timing both the exit and the reentry. Historically, a substantial share of September's have still produced positive returns—about 45% using price-only S&P 500 data since 1950 (or just over half using total-return data since 1925). Missing those positive months can outweigh the benefits of avoiding the negative ones, making the strategy far less reliable than it appears.
For most long-term investors, staying the course is the more reliable approach. Dollar-cost averaging or an automated contribution schedule means buying through September's dips as routine rather than trying to predict them. If a portfolio needs rebalancing, doing it on a fixed calendar rather than reacting to a seasonal narrative tends to produce steadier results—treating the September Effect as context, not a trading signal.
© 2026 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved
This Forbes article was legally licensed through AdvisorStream.
